Internet crime allegations are unlike any other charge: the "crime scene" is a hard drive, a phone, or a server log, and the State's entire case depends on convincing a jury that you were the person behind the keyboard. These cases are won and lost on digital forensics, attribution, and the legality of how the evidence was seized — and they are increasingly charged in both Missouri state court and federal court.

Cases Mike Defends

Online solicitation and enticement allegations — including sting operations where there was never a real minor involved
Possession or distribution of prohibited images — charged under Missouri Chapter 573 and federal law
Cyber harassment and stalking — threats, repeated contact, and social media disputes charged criminally
Computer tampering and unauthorized access — state charges and federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act cases
Online fraud, phishing, and identity theft allegations
Nonconsensual image (“revenge porn”) charges

Where These Cases Break

Attribution. An IP address identifies a connection, not a person. Shared Wi-Fi, shared devices, roommates, spyware, and spoofing all create reasonable doubt about who was actually at the keyboard.
The search. Digital warrants must be specific. Overbroad device seizures, stale probable cause, and searches that exceed the warrant's scope are suppression targets — and suppression often ends the case.
The forensics. Deleted files, cache artifacts, automatic downloads, and metadata are routinely misinterpreted by the State's examiners. Independent forensic review changes outcomes.
Sting conduct. In solicitation stings, what the officer typed, when, and who escalated the conversation matters enormously — entrapment and lack of intent are real defenses.

State and Federal Exposure

Because internet activity crosses state lines by definition, many of these cases can be — and are — charged federally, where sentencing guidelines are unforgiving. Mike is licensed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri and defends these cases in both systems. If agents have seized your devices or asked you to "come in and clear things up," do not talk, do not consent, and call immediately.

Key Missouri Law

RSMo § 566.151Enticement of a child

RSMo Chapter 573Pornography & related offenses, including § 573.110 (nonconsensual private images)

RSMo §§ 565.090–.091Harassment (including electronic communications)

RSMo §§ 569.095–.099Computer tampering

18 U.S.C. § 1030Federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act

Charged? Here's Your Next Move.

Do not give a statement. Do not consent to a search. Do not plead at your first appearance just to make it stop. Call or text (636)940-7771 — any hour, any day — or send the free case evaluation form and we'll get back to you fast.

★★★★★·“Honest, straightforward and effective.” — Josh★★★★★★·“The most competent attorney in Missouri.” — Brianna★★★★★★·“Professional, honest and tenacious.” — William★★★★★★·“Fair, honest attorney.” — Bryan★★★★★★·“Great guy and awesome lawyer.” — James★★★★★★·“Very professional and forthcoming.” — Jessica★★★★★★·“Best lawyers in St. Charles by far.” — Summer★★★★★★·“Gets the job done in your favor.” — Tim★★★★★★·“By far the best attorney in the state of Missouri.” — Monica★★★★★★·“Professional, knowledgeable, and very responsive.” — Doug H.★★★★★★·“Straightforward and no beating around the bush.” — Farrah★★★★★★·“Very helpful throughout my court procedures.” — Jacob★★★★★★·“Handled everything perfectly and got a great result.” — Maria★★★★★★·“Fair pricing, and did what he said he'd do.” — Bryon★★★★★★·“Always looking for ways to help any way he can.” — Zach★★★★★★·“Goes the extra mile to get your case handled swiftly and fairly.” — Leo★★★★★★·“Extremely professional from start to finish.” — Nick★★★★★★·“Absolutely the best at getting the best outcome.” — Kevy★★★★★★·“Very professional. The best there is.” — Jeff★★★★★★·“Very pleased with the results of his efforts.” — Terrence★★★★★★·“One of the best attorneys I've ever had the pleasure of working with.” — Bruce★★★★★★·“Completely competent and genuinely cares about his clients.” — Steven★★★★★★·“Always available, responding quickly every time I called.” — Michael★★★★★★·“Handled my case with no penalty. Very kind and caring.” — Kenzie★★★★★★·“Honest, straightforward and effective.” — Josh★★★★★★·“The most competent attorney in Missouri.” — Brianna★★★★★★·“Professional, honest and tenacious.” — William★★★★★★·“Fair, honest attorney.” — Bryan★★★★★★·“Great guy and awesome lawyer.” — James★★★★★★·“Very professional and forthcoming.” — Jessica★★★★★★·“Best lawyers in St. Charles by far.” — Summer★★★★★★·“Gets the job done in your favor.” — Tim★★★★★★·“By far the best attorney in the state of Missouri.” — Monica★★★★★★·“Professional, knowledgeable, and very responsive.” — Doug H.★★★★★★·“Straightforward and no beating around the bush.” — Farrah★★★★★★·“Very helpful throughout my court procedures.” — Jacob★★★★★★·“Handled everything perfectly and got a great result.” — Maria★★★★★★·“Fair pricing, and did what he said he'd do.” — Bryon★★★★★★·“Always looking for ways to help any way he can.” — Zach★★★★★★·“Goes the extra mile to get your case handled swiftly and fairly.” — Leo★★★★★★·“Extremely professional from start to finish.” — Nick★★★★★★·“Absolutely the best at getting the best outcome.” — Kevy★★★★★★·“Very professional. The best there is.” — Jeff★★★★★★·“Very pleased with the results of his efforts.” — Terrence★★★★★★·“One of the best attorneys I've ever had the pleasure of working with.” — Bruce★★★★★★·“Completely competent and genuinely cares about his clients.” — Steven★★★★★★·“Always available, responding quickly every time I called.” — Michael★★★★★★·“Handled my case with no penalty. Very kind and caring.” — Kenzie★

Internet Crimes Defense

Cases Mike Defends

Where These Cases Break

State and Federal Exposure

Key Missouri Law

Charged? Here's Your Next Move.